Minister Azalina clarifies that MACC investigations follow evidence-based procedures, with no selective prosecution in corruption cases
PETALING JAYA: There is no such thing as selective prosecution in corruption cases, as all decisions depend on the outcome of investigations conducted by enforcement agencies, said Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said.
In a written reply to the Dewan Negara, Azalina said the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) carries out its duties based on the principles of independence, transparency and professionalism.
“Investigations are conducted based on information received and supported by strong evidence before any action is taken.
“If sufficient evidence is obtained, MACC will take appropriate action against any individual in accordance with the law,” she said.
Azalina added that each case is investigated separately and depends on witness testimony and the available evidence.
“Once investigations are completed, the investigation papers are referred to the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) for further action and consideration.”
She said prosecutors would carefully review the investigation papers to determine whether charges should be filed in court.
“If the papers are complete and contain strong evidence to support charges, prosecution will proceed. If there are shortcomings in the investigation, the prosecution will issue further instructions for additional investigations,” she said.
Azalina was responding to Senator Datuk Salehuddin Saidin, who asked whether MACC is serious about taking action against bribe givers, stressing that corruption offences involve both the giver and the recipient and that both can face the same punishment if convicted.
