Chief Justice Wan Ahmad Farid says the 30% salary increase for judges is a meaningful commitment to judicial welfare and independence
KUALA LUMPUR: Chief Justice Datuk Seri Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh has described the 30% salary increase for judges as a meaningful commitment to judicial welfare.
Speaking at the Opening of the Legal Year 2026, he expressed gratitude to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the government for the timely adjustment.
He highlighted that judges do not receive annual increments and are barred from other offices or business.
“This is the first adjustment in a decade,” Wan Ahmad Farid said.
He stated the increment reflects a clear recognition of the demands placed upon judicial office.
“It also demonstrates a meaningful commitment to enhancing the welfare of the Judiciary,” he added.
The Chief Justice said the increase supports a resilient and credible administration of justice.
He noted that the pay rise, in his view, contributes directly to promoting judicial independence.
The landmark salary increase, now gazetted, took effect on 1 January.
This measure fulfils a pledge made by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim in the 2026 Budget.
It applies to all judges from the High Court to the Federal Court.
He also stated that enhanced judicial remuneration must be matched with heightened responsibility.
She reminded judges that judicial office carries the expectation of extensive reading and staying abreast of legal and societal developments.
“In a rapidly evolving legal landscape, continuous learning is not a choice; it is a duty,” she said.
The Chief Justice reiterated that fair compensation serves as an important safeguard for the judiciary.
She explained that a fairly compensated judiciary helps shield judges from undue influence and encourages capable legal minds to serve.
It also allows judges to discharge their duties without undue financial concern.
Wan Ahmad Farid added that he had explored introducing performance-based incentives for Superior Court judges.
This consideration followed his first 100 days in office.
He noted that such incentives would reward judges demonstrating diligence, discipline and commitment to timely duties.
“This practice is not new. It is adopted in certain comparable jurisdictions, including Singapore, and it is one that merits careful and principled consideration,” he said.
