Restriction approved by Cabinet aimed at protecting minors from online harm that includes scams, cyberbullying and exposure to inappropriate content: Minister
PETALING JAYA: The government move to bar children under 16 from having social media accounts has ignited strong reactions from young Malaysians who say that while safety matters, a blanket ban risks shutting them out of vital learning, creativity and communication spaces.
Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil announced yesterday that the Cabinet had approved the proposed restriction, which aims to protect minors from online harm, including from scams, cyberbullying and exposure to inappropriate content.
The measure, expected to be enforced next year, will compel social media platforms to adopt the new age limit.
But even as some youths acknowledge the safety concerns, many say the ban could come at the expense of education and digital literacy.
Afiqah (not her real name), 15, said she disagrees with the move but understands its intention.
“I’m already 15 and I love to draw. So, a lot of what I do online is actually learning. I follow artists, watch step-by-step tutorials on social media and YouTube and even join drawing challenges that help me improve.
“I also use these platforms to talk to my friends and watch videos that explain things we learn in class. So, if they suddenly say people under 16 can’t have accounts anymore, it feels a bit unfair.”
Afiqah, who started using social media at 13, said most of her friends are responsible users. She also questioned the scope of the ban.
“When they say ‘ban social media’, what exactly does that include? Does it mean video platforms too? Because sometimes, YouTube and TikTok are where we watch school lessons, revision videos, tutorials and study tips – literally things that help us learn.
“Some apps are actually more helpful than harmful if you use them properly.”
Hiresh (not his real name), 13, said a total ban may be excessive.
“I think the plan has good intentions but banning social media for under-16s is too strict.
“Social media is both helpful and harmful. It helps us learn and communicate but it can also expose us to risks.”
He urged the government to strengthen protection for minors rather than shut them out entirely.
“A fairer way is to improve safety tools, teach online safety and use stronger age checks instead of a full ban.
“Some adults understand but many don’t. They worry about dangers but forget that social media also helps us learn and stay connected. Parents’ worries are valid but I think they should see social media in another way too.”
Thirteen-year-old Aiman (not his real name) offered a contrasting view, saying he agrees with the move.
“I’ve seen my friends chatting at 1am or 2am when they’re supposed to be sleeping.”
Aiman, who is not allowed to have social media accounts, said his parents enforce strict screen-time rules.
A parent, who asked to be known only as Aliyah, said the ban is timely.
“At that young age, social media does more harm than good. I have to put my foot down when my children ask to open an account.
“My husband and I also make sure the computer is placed in a common area and not in the children’s rooms. If I allow them to have a computer each in their own room, I’m basically inviting the possibility of predators entering their lives.”
