Safe School Framework 2.0 integrates emotional support, trauma prevention and community networks to address student mental health and bullying
KUALA LUMPUR: The Safe School Framework 2.0 must systematically integrate emotional support, trauma prevention and community involvement according to its chief researcher.
Associate Professor Datuk Dr Monna Ong Siew Siew said the current education system still primarily focuses on punitive disciplinary measures.
This new framework aims to address mental health challenges, cyberbullying and psychological issues faced by students more holistically.
The main goal is to build a safe, resilient and humane learning ecosystem with mental wellbeing as a key educational success indicator.
“This integrated system will also include support networks involving schools, parents, local communities and health and safety agencies,” she said.
“Through this integration, it will act as the backbone of national policy, coordinating information and interventions across sectors.”
Monna presented the framework proposal at the Mental Health and Emotional Resilience in Schools Academic Forum at Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology.
The event was attended by principals, headmasters, school counsellors and parents.
The original Safe School Framework was first introduced by the Ministry of Education in 2002.
It aimed to create a safe school environment for teaching, learning and extracurricular activities free from disruption.
Monna highlighted that academic pressure, emotional crises and harmful behaviour risks reveal the urgent need for structured psychosocial support.
This need is reinforced by Student Discipline Management System data showing rising physical bullying cases.
The system recorded 7,681 physical bullying cases last year compared to 6,528 in 2023.
“Statistics show a 60% increase in students experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety and post-pandemic stress,” she added.
“Issues of violence and emotional distress among students should not be viewed merely as disciplinary problems.”
“They are the result of psychological pressure, social isolation and gaps in emotional support systems within schools.”
Monna also proposed establishing a National Mental Health and School Crisis Intervention Council.
This council would coordinate cross-agency efforts and oversee pilot testing of the new framework’s proposals. – Bernama
