CERTAIN quarters are calling out Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to “stop behaving like an Opposition leader”, likely triggered by Anwar’s probing of the potential squandering of billions worth of funds, allegedly associated with the previous government.
It is unclear how one would define a “real” prime minister (PM), but if setting high standards, carrying the economic burden with the people, having his first order of business to look into the “tummy” economy and cost of living issues while simultaneously tackling potential mega corruption cases and scandals and balancing tricky Cabinet dynamics to ensure stability do not fit into the definition, then I do not know what is.
Anwar set a high bar by example when he chose not to take a salary despite helming two roles, and was able to get the ministers to agree to a 20% salary reduction as a sign of sharing the economic burden with the rakyat.
Additionally, within a short timeframe, we see efforts to drop the prices of eggs, with storage plans to ensure sustainable supply.
On top of this, given how gambling has serious impacts on society, whereby it has been associated with addiction, bankruptcy, crime, family problems such as divorce and domestic abuse and even suicide, Anwar’s administration reduced special lottery draws to just eight per year from 22 under the Perikatan Nasional reign. This is for the society’s benefit.
While focusing on the people, Anwar did not forget to look into potential misappropriation of funds, corruption and potential scandals, which are all well within his role as PM and finance minister.
Thus, contrary to the statement, this is indeed one of the roles of the PM. It is wrong to think that uncovering scandals, corruption and fighting syndicates and cartels are simply the role of an Opposition leader. If anything, this is a role for all lawmakers, what more for the PM and finance minister.
The fish rots from the head and similarly, culture starts from the top. If Anwar wants to change the deep and widespread corruption culture, then it starts with him. Thus, Anwar is staying true to his brand (which should also be other politicians’ brand) of absolute rejection of corruption.
Malaysia has many issues, and Anwar is doing a tough balancing act. It has only been a few days and his priorities are very clear – people, people, people! And make no mistake that cleaning up a corrupt system is ultimately for the benefit of the people. Democracy is hard work, and addressing immediate-term socioeconomic issues is one thing, but repairing a broken system is even harder.
While Anwar is doing what is good for the nation and the people, he is also cleaning up the mess left behind due to poor governance and integrity of the past. Addressing near-term economic issues must go hand-in-hand with sowing the long-term seeds of change.
It is inevitable that Anwar will carry his brand of reforms, which, whether some like it or not, entails uncovering scandals and putting a stop to corrupt deals and practices. Reforms have been the central messaging in Pakatan Harapan and in its election manifesto, so when it was voted into power, it only makes sense to pursue what it has been fighting for.
Not to mention that it is also what a lot of voters want as evidently shown by Pakatan Harapan garnering the highest share of popular votes.
In other words, it is not only staying true to its mission but is upholding the mandate of the people.
Moving forward, Anwar’s administration should look into the “Innovation Agenda” (IA), which has the potential to cover the new mandate aimed squarely at social, institutional and economic challenges that demand the government’s most immediate attention.
The focus of IA is:
1. Unity and Tolerance: Spousing a common identity will serve the collective interest of society.
2. Radical Transparency and Good Governance: Anwar’s contemporary “Reformasi” movement means implementing genuine institutional reforms, moving towards an impact-oriented use of government resources that quantifies and measures outcomes and results.
3. Curbing Costs: Disintermediation and breaking up monopolies should be the administration’s top priority, focusing on bloated value chains with restricted approved permits for such as rice, sugar and other agricultural items.
4. Food Security: The government and agricultural government-linked companies must take the lead in investing in and promoting the use of innovative technologies and sustainable practices in farming, fishing and livestock so that they become innovation industries.
5. Digital Transformation: Complementing local startups with internationally sourced IP and knowledge transfer from wherever it exists so that it not only finds a thriving community and ecosystem in Malaysia but also serves as a launching pad for spring-boarding into the exciting digital marketplaces in Southeast Asia.
6. Sunrise Technologies: Cleantech companies will surely become the largest enterprises in the world, replacing tech giants in the not-too-distant future. The existential challenges of climate change are engendering a shift in consciousness in the way that humans balance their consumption with the environment.
7. Foreign Investment: Reverse Malaysia’s diminishing role as an investment destination of choice. Build up its public and private marketplaces and exchanges so that it is worthy of attracting global funding sources looking for high quality, high tech, high-value investment returns.
Related to attracting foreign investments, there should be a revival of Malaysia as a destination for tourists, and this requires a full appreciation of the intersection between tourism, art and culture. The importance and magnitude of Malaysia’s creative industry in the world today must not be underestimated.
The IA suggested above and promoted by the new administration would be a holistic movement in which the government can take the lead to replace outdated and broken old systems at the pain points of society, institutions and the economy. It is also to replace unfair exploitation, with impartial empowerment, to better serve the needs of the people now and for Malaysia’s future progress.
Thus, Anwar’s administration has a clear and well defined path. It is doing all of it and setting up future waypoints. Thus, cleaning up remains a priority and must be done in tandem.
Instilling a new culture of abhorrence of corruption is needed to avoid repeating issues that have long plagued the nation. The culture from the top must be set now to rebuild government institutions with the right governance and integrity. This is not “just another government”. As Einstein said, doing the same things and expecting different results is insanity. In contrast, Anwar’s administration signals a systemic shift to create a system that is radically transparent that benefits many, not an opaque system for only the elites.
It will shake the boat and many will try to fight back but it is a necessary battle. Thus, all of these are part of the plan where expectations and timelines will be set. Let the process of resetting Malaysia unfold accordingly.
Dr Rais Hussin is the president and chief executive officer of EMIR Research, a think tank focused on strategic policy recommendations based on rigorous research. Comments: letters@thesundaily.com.
