Since the dawn of human cognition, confirmation bias has played an influential role in how we perceive the world.

It refers to our tendency to seek, interpret and remember information that supports our pre-existing beliefs while ignoring or downplaying information that contradicts them.

In the early days of humanity, when decisions had to be made quickly and based on limited information, relying on past patterns often helped our ancestors survive.

However, in today’s world, where information is abundant and constantly bombarding us, confirmation bias is more of a hindrance than a help.

Confirmation bias stems from the brain’s natural inclination towards cognitive ease.

Humans are wired to avoid cognitive dissonance, the uncomfortable feeling that comes from holding two conflicting beliefs.

In the 1950s, psychologist Leon Festinger introduced the concept of cognitive dissonance, which is closely tied to confirmation bias.

When we encounter information that challenges our pre-existing beliefs, our minds experience discomfort.

To reduce this dissonance, we dismiss or rationalise conflicting data and instead focus on information that aligns with our worldview.

One of the most pervasive examples lies in the curated nature of our social media feeds.

Algorithms, designed to keep us engaged, prioritise content that aligns with our past interactions, creating a self-reinforcing loop.

For instance, if you frequently “like” posts about healthy eating, your feed will likely become saturated with similar content, leading you to believe that everyone is obsessed with kale smoothies and quinoa bowls.

This constant stream of affirming information can create an illusion of consensus, making us feel that our preferences and beliefs are the norm, even if they represent a niche perspective.

Over time, this can lead to a distorted view of reality, where we overestimate the prevalence of our viewpoints and underestimate the diversity of perspectives that exist.

In consumer behaviour, confirmation bias manifests as brand loyalty.

A person who has had a positive experience with a particular brand, such as a tech company, might overlook negative reviews of its products while giving more weight to positive reviews.

Even when competitors offer better products or features, this person may avoid exploring other options because of their strong belief in their chosen brand’s superiority.

Research in marketing psychology has shown that consumers often rationalise their purchasing decisions after the fact, reinforcing their loyalty to a brand even when evidence suggests otherwise.

Health decisions are another area where confirmation bias can have serious consequences.

For example, someone who holds a preconceived belief about alternative medicine, such as homeopathy, may actively seek out anecdotal stories or testimonials that support their stance while dismissing or ignoring the vast body of scientific evidence that demonstrates its ineffectiveness.

This can lead to reliance on unproven remedies, potentially delaying or avoiding necessary medical treatments.

As seen in various cases, misinformation about alternative cures for serious diseases can proliferate online, reinforcing harmful beliefs.

Even personal relationships are not immune to the effects of confirmation bias.

When faced with a personal conflict or life decision, people often seek advice from friends or family members who they know will agree with them.

This reinforces their existing view of the situation, whether it’s about a career move, relationship conflict or significant life choice.

By doing this, individuals may avoid hearing perspectives that could challenge their thinking, preventing personal growth or a more well-rounded understanding of the situation.

In work environments, this bias can contribute to poor team dynamics, as individuals might only seek feedback from like-minded colleagues, leading to groupthink and limiting innovation.

In decision-making, confirmation bias can lead to poor choices, as individuals fail to consider alternative viewpoints or critical information.

This is particularly evident in financial decisions, where investors may cling to optimistic reports about a stock or investment they favour, ignoring warning signs that suggest otherwise.

In the public sphere, confirmation bias contributes to the spread of misinformation.

As people share and amplify content that aligns with their beliefs – whether it’s accurate or not – the information spreads rapidly, leading to misinformation or “fake news” dominating public discourse.

One effective strategy to mitigate this is to actively seek out contradictory information.

This means going beyond our comfort zones to consume media and opinions that challenge our beliefs.

For example, if someone regularly reads articles from one news outlet, they can make a point to explore news from outlets with different viewpoints.

While this doesn’t mean they have to agree with opposing perspectives, exposure to different ideas broadens their understanding of complex issues.

Critical thinking is another powerful tool. This involves engaging with information actively by asking questions such as: “Is this based on credible evidence” and “Are there alternative explanations.”

By cultivating a sceptical and analytical mindset, individuals can reduce their susceptibility to confirmation bias and make more informed, well-rounded decisions.

A key component of critical thinking is the ability to evaluate sources and distinguish between reliable information and propaganda or misinformation.

Engaging in conversations with open-minded individuals can also help break this cycle.

By talking with people who hold different views, without the intent to argue or convince, we can gain fresh perspectives and foster intellectual flexibility.

These conversations encourage curiosity and help dismantle the walls of the echo chambers we often build around ourselves.

Lastly, it is important to embrace uncertainty.

Many people fall into confirmation bias because they crave certainty and comfort.

Accepting that we don’t have all the answers – and that our beliefs are subject to change as new information emerges – creates space for intellectual humility and growth.

By acknowledging that we could be wrong, we remain open to learning and adapting, which is critical in an age where information is constantly evolving.

Whether in the realm of media consumption, personal relationships, health decisions or politics, confirmation bias can lead us to make poorly informed choices and entrench ourselves in echo chambers.

By recognising its influence and adopting strategies to counter it, such as seeking diverse perspectives, engaging in critical thinking and embracing uncertainty, we can break free from these limitations and make more balanced, well-informed decisions.

The writer is a certified mental health and awareness practitioner specialising in narcissistic abuse recovery. Comments: letters@thesundaily.com